You’ll also be less likely to disrupt animals or other people because your flash hider has the added benefit of reducing flash signature. In real-world settings, do flash hiders actually work? Flash hiders work very well to reduce the blinding effect of muzzle blasts you may experience in dim or low-light environments. If you hunt at night or participate in tactical drills after dark, minimizing flash can be instrumental to achieving your shooting goals. By doing so, flash is vastly reduced because the prongs of the flash hider break up the muzzle blast. The mechanics of these flash hiders are identical: nearly all of them are engineered to disperse gas and unburnt propellant that is leaving the muzzle. The most common types of flash hiders are 3-prong, 4-prong, or closed-tine designs. Many training schools outright ban them from use, especially indoors.Flash hiders work by redirecting the gases exiting the barrel of your firearm. Of course, state laws are a factor on that one.īrakes and Comps have their purposes, but they are almost entirely designed around either competition settings or suppressed fire. The A2 birdcage does a fine job, but there are other good ones on the market. My simple advice is that most people are better off with a flash hider. But as a lawyer once told me, words have meanings and precision of language is important. I get it, I’m spending a lot of time picking at the nuances between two muzzle devices that do nearly the same thing. You can do a lot with just your body mechanics before needing to jump up to some external device. The average shooter should really work on their fundamentals of recoil management first. We’re talking world-class shooters competing against one another. These devices help with that.īut I caution you, here. At very high levels, competitors use any possible edge they can find to shoot faster and more accurately. Secondly, brakes and comps have their uses for very fast-paced shooting competitions. Muzzle devices, after all, are relatively cheap and easy to replace compared to the internals of a suppressor. The idea is to extend the life of the suppressor by reducing blast erosion. They are using the steel of the muzzle device as a kind of sacrificial first baffle in the suppressor’s function. In the real world, there’s really only two reasons to use some of these things.įirst, a lot of suppressor companies use brakes and comps as attachment devices for their suppressors. Sometimes, though, I can’t help but wonder if some of these devices are just meant to look cool. In general, as is usually the case, these hybrid compensators are outperformed by devices designed to do only one of those things well. The idea is to reduce recoil, hold the muzzle stable, and reduce flash. Because of that, there is a market for hybrid devices that try to do a little of everything. That’s no fault of his own, these kinds of projects take time and funding beyond what us normal people normally have. Vuurwapenblog did a pretty good job in this regard, though his selection was rather limited compared to something like the TTAG’s brake shootout, which only looked at rearward recoil. The compensators perform somewhere in the middle of the pack and flash hiders perform the worst.Ī proper comparison would look at both the rearward recoil forces as well as muzzle deflection. In these tests, the pure muzzle brakes like the M4-72 perform the best. In my view, one of the failings in these articles is that they usually only measure a single aspect, such as rearward recoil force. There are a lot of reviews out there comparing muzzle devices.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |